After filling an opinion to the EU Court of Justice on the 8th of July 2014, involving the companionability of the Council of Europe Convention on the Exploitation of Sports Competitions with the EU Treaties, Malta has revisited the claim and has decided to as the court to eradicate it. This comes after Malta claimed that it had submitted this court request so that they can be made understand if “illegal betting” was reliable with the main aims of the Treaty. Malta had argued that the clear definition of “illegal sports betting” was deemed to go as far as conventional capacity and would not indulge in the match fixing brawl.
According to parliamentary secretary for competitiveness José Herrera, the point of view on the Convention of Malta will be open and unmovable. Malta has been on the fore front in the support of this main aim of Convention that will be vital in the prevention of any competitive sport exploitation. Furthermore Malta is currently undertaking an implementation that will see the execution of harsh rules that would eradicate fraud as well as sports exploitation.
Herrera continued to note that it has been of great concern for Malta to have it understand the clear elaboration of ‘illegal sports betting” which it believes that it has been seen to surpass the vastness of the Convention but it is not in any way involved in the eradication of match fixing. This prompted Malta to table in several proposals that would see the Conventional changed in some clauses.
However, the committee in charge rejected these schemes and Malta opted to disband and reject the implementation of the Convention. This was followed by the refusal of putting a signature on the initiation of the Convention in September 2014.
He concluded by saying that the current affairs which were followed by a deeper go through of the legislative proposal, Malta decided to believe that there will be other open chances that would be more readily available. As per now, Malta has decided to drop the request and indulge in internal state affairs which would be achieved via a comprehensive dialogue with the European top level which it believed would never renounce its rights as well as its privileges.
Recent Comments